UnitSmiley said:
I think you are falling into the trap of "Oh it has guns and violence, it must just be a generic game attempting to interest the "adult" audience". Sure, some games use gore and violence as a selling point and then label the game as mature. Not all games are like this though. The Last of Us is going to deal a lot with the relationship between Ellie and Joel as they struggle to survive. The gore and violence isn't used as a selling point, it's used as a tool to show off just how desperate the situation has become. Like the trailers/gameplay has illustrated, the situation is so dire that the chance of another living human being betraying and killing you is almost as high as a clicker chasing you down and devouring you. It addresses the morality of killing another human being for the sake of survival.
|
I'm not being dismissive about the last of us. There are tons of great and mature games that feature guns in them. I don't know much about the Last of Us honestly. My PS3 is broken, and I won't have the money to replace it for some time, which kills my interest in this game. Could be great for all I know.
What I'm dismissing is the fact that when he wanted to prove that something was mature, his first instinct was to pull up a picture of some dude getting his head blown off. Clearly, the argument being made by those pictures was
"Game A features a shot gun and blood and game B features bright primary colors. Clearly game A is more mature." I'm not trying to dismiss the last of us. I'm trying to dismiss the idiotic and ironically immature argument that was put forth.







