Raze said:
The Sony Cell is an 8 core processor, which fares to current max cores on the PC market. Jumping to a different company's 8 core processor makes little sense for little gain. Optomising the Cell's design to run at higher mhz per core saves them money, which keeps production costs down. The GPU, for all the rumors floating around, is little known yet. I don't doubt it'll be a faster GPU than the PS3, but the improvements will be sublte, as you said - likely more a framerate increase instead of added shadows or big jump in poly count. As console development takes time, the specs never match high end PC gaming. New video cards are coming out every few months, by the time a console developer decides on a GPU, there's already something better in the PC market. As development likely started at least 1 year, if not 2 years ago, the GPU will be on par with high end PC graphics from that time frame. With luck, the PS4/720 specs might perform graphically equivalent to my PC, which I built in 2011, and that's not a bad thing. Radeon HD 6790 with 1 Gb ram on it, I can play L4D2 on max settings. Of course with the new PCIe standard coming out in 2014, it'll be time to upgrade the mobo and vid card to get something even stronger. |
I guess we'll see soon. But, what it sounds like to me when they say that hardware specs are not gonna be there focus is that they just are not gonna go out and just boast about their specs like they did with the ps3. To me they mean they will actually focus on games and showing more social aspects of the consoles than anything like MS, but with more social aspects with games rather than just social aspects on the conoles to dominate your living room so you just spend money on MS instead. IMO, MS is going the wrong way with their console and forcing people to do everything MS's way.







