dsgrue3 said:
Alright, I think you're missing the point here. You act like the Qur'an goes into intimate details of the process. This is embryology in its entirety in the Qur'an:
This isn't revolutionary at all - it's incredibly ambiguous and not distinct from knowledge of Embyology of the time - it isn't erroneous because there isn't enough detail/specifics to show errors. Example: The Sun rises and falls in the sky. Not erroneous from human perspective, but completely fallacious in regard to knowledge of orbit/rotation/axis tilt. |
simply hilarious
| R.I.P Mr Iwata :'( | ||
![]() |
|
|









