| Roma said: lol will do, I love biology so this will be interesting |
I've found enough to debunk embryology in the Qur'an. Read them if you wish. I will cite important sections from each.
Keith L. Moore knows that the Koran is wrong when it says that bones are formed first, then flesh is placed upon them.
"Look further at the bones, how We bring them together and clothe them with flesh ..." (Al-Baqara 2:259)
The Koran gives the impression that first the skeleton is formed, and then it is clothed with mustle. Dr. Bucaille knows perfectly well that this is not true. The muscles and the cartilage precursors of the bones start forming from the somite at the same time. At the end of the eighth week there are only a few centers of ossification started but the fetus is already capable of some muscular movement."
STAGES OF PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT ACCORDING TO HIPPOCRATES (460 BC)
STAGE 1. sperm
STAGE 2. mother's blood descends around the membrane
STAGE 3. flesh, fed through umbilicus
STAGE 4. bones
Clearly this shows that 1000 years before the Qur'an the development of the embryo was divided into stages.
STAGES OF PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT ACCORDING TO ARISTOTLE (350 BC)
STAGE 1. sperm
STAGE 2. catamenia -- menstrual blood
STAGE 3. flesh
STAGE 4. bones
STAGE 5. around the bones grow the fleshy parts
For comparison with the Qur'an:
QURANIC STAGES OF PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT
STAGE 1. nutfa -- sperm
STAGE 2. 'alaqa -- clot
STAGE 3. mudagha -- piece or lump of flesh
STAGE 4. 'adaam -- bones
STAGE 5. dressing the bones with muscles
It is abundantly clear to anyone looking at this objectively that not only did the Qur'an borrow ideas from pre-existing knowledge of Embryology from Gala, Aristotle, and Hippocrates, but it did so incorrectly - bones before muscles is completely inaccurate.
