Roma said:
IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
Roma said:
| IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
How about the materials that our universe consist of has always existed yet didn't shape anything significant until after the big bang occured?
Why is it so unrealistic to imagine that such materials always have existed while a god that has existed forever makes perfect sense?
|
because rules are created by someone intelligent
everything has rules except the creator who is not bound by anything.
why can the universe create itself yet a castle in the desert can't?
|
Surely, if the particles randomly messes around with each other for an eternity it isn't too farfetched to assume that a notable reaction will occur at some point?
Or at least less farfetched than assuming that an almighty creator would create all this and then proceed to communicate with us through books, miracles and prophets. Again, despite knowing exactly what will happen and when.
|
if the material was there and it became something by itself then you do suggest that it did create itself
so you believe that a castle can create itself as I see no difference in the universe creating itself and the castle yet people would say one it utter nonsense but the other is perfectly logical
du ska väl också såva nu väll shit så sent. jag hoppas att du tycker att detta är intressant o inte bara löjligt 
|
If these particles reacted to each other for an eternity it would actually make no sense to say that they never will shape a castle. Especially since we humans consist of particles and actually have created castles, thus proving my point.
Ja, detta är sannerligen intressant. Sov gott 
