Roma said:
dsgrue3 said:
Your evidence is a book. Okay...got it. Finally you admit to having no evidence.
I agree, big difference. You seem to be arguing for the former more than the latter. But, even arguing for a Creator - I have shown that causality only applies within the Universe - meaning a Creator is not necessary (or, we cannot logically conclude one is necessary).
The baby I was trying to describe why causality doesn't apply outside/before the universe, but it proved to be a bad example. I just want you to take note that certain things that exist in the room with the baby may or may not exist outside the room. Vice versa works as well, but doesn't really fit the point I was trying to make.
I have no evidence that would lead me to believe in a Creator, that's the only reason. Without evidence, I will not believe in something. I'm not saying it can't be true, just that I do not believe it is true - same with ghosts.
|
that book has many things written in it that was not possible for humans to know about at that time which makes it a reliable book
who created the Universe?
do you believe in different dimensions?
|
According to whom does the book have things written in it that were not possible to know? And which things in particular?
Like I said, there isn't anything to suggest the need for a creator of the Universe. And I don't have cemented views in regard to how it came to be, they change based upon more reading/hypothesizing.
I do believe in different dimensions because of physical things like black holes for which we've little to no information.
