Roma said:
dsgrue3 said:
Roma said:
dsgrue3 said:
1&2) Since they are the exact same thing divided into 2 posts for some nonsensical reason. You have defined causality - a principle that is only applicable within our Universe. Note: within. Not outside, not prior.
3) Evidence? Zilch.
4) Evidence? Zilch.
I see nothing rational about your thought process. Try again please using evidence.
|
you believe in unproven human theories yet you do not understand belive in simple logic?
if you don't use rational thinking you can't understand rational explanations either so no matter what I say you won't understand
|
Huh? I don't believe in anything that isn't proven or has an abundance of evidence for it.
If you don't understand something, let me know, don't simply say "oh you're irrational".
I'm not being remotely irrational. I said the principle you identified - causality is something that only exists within the constraints of our Universe, not before it - not outside it (if outside exists).
Again, no evidence for 3 or 4. You are being irrational. Not me.
|
I thought I explained why God is not a creation -_-. If God was a creation and the creator of God had a creator and so on we would not have existed since the Gods would be busy creating Gods so we would not exist. also if there is more than one God they would fight on who would have power over what so what would be the reason for a God to create a God? does this make sense to you?
let me know so I can explain the other point
|
I'm sorry, is that supposed to be evidence of a god? That's a philosphical discussion of the eternal existence of a God. Irrelevant. If you have any evidence to support the existence of a God, I'll hear it. I have yet to read any on your end. Not a single shred of evidence. Just endless nonsense and suppositions. Do you have evidence or no?
Do you believe in unicorns? Oh, you don't? Well, then you're arrogant.
If a baby is born in a room without gravity, is it fair for the baby to conclude that gravity does not exist outside that room?
