Kasz216 said:
Violent crime rates are far more applicable then gun related homicides. Afterall, gun related homicide vs non-gun related homicide? What's the point int splitting them up? You can't kill somone with a gun you'll kill them another way.
However, a supressing effect guns have on other violent crimes? Pretty applicable i'd say. |
Glad you said that cause US ranks higher in homicides amongs devloped countires, AND gun related homicides :). So clearly guns aren't stopping homicides in the states. SInce it ranks highest in both gun related and non gun related homicides per capita amongst delevloped countries. Sure other countries rank high in rape or other violent form of crimes, but that's a whole other issue.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate#By_country
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate
Either way I'm done replying. No offense to you or anything, but I added my two cents. I wan't looking to argue or anything (not implying you are). Pretty clear stats on the homicide rates with and without guns for US. If you want to keep your guns than keep your guns, but don't come up with bugus stats to make excuses to do so. I'd rather hear hey I want to keep my gun because the risks don't outweight the benefits for me, and sure more people will die, but I like the freedom of having my gun. Just don't try to hide behind backwards stats or start twisting the issue.
I was walking down along the street and I heard this voice saying, "Good evening, Mr. Dowd." Well, I turned around and here was this big six-foot rabbit leaning up against a lamp-post. Well, I thought nothing of that because when you've lived in a town as long as I've lived in this one, you get used to the fact that everybody knows your name.