| ninjablade said: did you read the article, most of it is cold hard facts, at first some people said eurogamer rushed the article but its going on 2 days now and nobody corrected anything, even neogaf are accepting the 352 gflops numbers now here is quote i found intersting in the comment section. |
Not a single one of the claims in the article are "cold hard facts". Most of them are regurgitations of theories put forward on NeoGAF, and even the people at NeoGAF are themselves criticising the article for its absurdity.
NeoGAF are mostly considering the 352 GFLOPS number to be the best guess at this point in time, but it's not at all certain, yet, and even the people at NeoGAF will say that it might not be right. Indeed, one of the theories by one of the most well-respected people at NeoGAF (the guy who made the thread about the die image, in fact) is that the shader units may not be symmetric, and thus is may actually be pushing more than the popular estimate.
Meanwhile, I find it funny that you take a quote from someone in the comments section of Eurogamer as somehow representing fact, when we actually know less about the CPU than the GPU. I mean... really?
