mrstickball on 14 February 2008
Lightning - it wouldn't.
That was my argument about FFX. Personally, I don't really see much of a difference between Lost Odyssey and FFVIII-FFX-2.
The LOWEST main-line Final Fantasy rated was X-2, at 86.4%.
Was/is Lost Odyssey better than the piece of crap known as X-2? I tend to think so. Yet LO is 10% lower. How is that justifiable? Oblivion was all too similar of Morrowind, and could be argued that it was an inferior next-gen rehash of MW principles, yet it still garnered 92%+ average rankings. Was that fair for Oblivion? Sure. But why kill LO for the same reasoning?
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.
