By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JWeinCom said:
platformmaster918 said:
curl-6 said:
SxyxS said:
I think the same games published by nintendo and mario instead ofa sly would be rated around 90% and called a super innovative nintendo stealth jump'n'run.

Unlikely, critics often criticize Mario games.

and then give them great ratings using such objective decriptions as "It'll bring back childhood memories" and "Nintendo magic".  Ummmmm ok how about getting someone to review it who didn't grow up playing Mario or can simply put his personal feelings aside from his childhood?

NSMB 2 got reviews about the same as what Sly is getting.  Paper Mario Sticker Star too.  NSMBU was slightly better but still not great.  Dunno where these Mario games that critics fawn over are.


Remember, if a Sony game doesn't get great reviews it can't be because it's not a great game.  It's because the media is biased.

Of course, Ninteno fans will say the same thing in reverse too.

your last 2 sentence are right,but

the mario games rated so low were either because of too much recycling in a too short period(nsmb(u)) or because of the dissapointment that paper mario was not what it should be:an Rpg.

but you will nowhere read such overwhelming critics for sly than you will for mario.

 

just take any 90% review from the latest rayman(nothing to do with sony) and mario.the rayman game is described more in a professionell way by the raters,mario reviews always sound like magic,phantastic,jesus returns etc.And i'm pretty sure the same will happen with the soon released rayman wii U exclusiv.

as result:rayman3ds sales=10000,mario2d 3ds=5mio(that's why i'm pretty sure that