| Michael-5 said: B) How many people could you kill with a Mass Shoveling? LOL. A gun is just too easy of a mean to kill people, a Knife requires effort, and some physique. So yes, I agree you need to work on a lot of issues in the USA, Education, Mental Health, Resprct, and Tolerance, but that's going to take a long time to fix....Why not make it much harder to get guns until then? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics |
B) Nice strawman argument. Read about Japan mass stabbing and get a clue:
http://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=80964&page=1
D) What math? It says it isn't as reliable, so you use the actual crime statistics that aren't open to interpretation like this source that I've already posted:
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_rap-crime-rapes
And not a wikipedia entry that says this:
This list[5] indicates the number of, and per capita cases of recorded rape. It does not include cases of rape which go unreported, or which are not recorded.[6] Nor does it specify whether recorded means reported, brought to trial, or convicted. Nor does it take the different definition of rape around the world into account.
Assault was basically a wash - 786 vs. 737, in other words, not statistically significant.
Simply listing gun crime is meaningless to the discussion. Obviously gun crime is higher in the US. Did you have a point?
D-II) Yeah, kid, that's exactly what I said. They don't travel to Canada because it's an additional thousand miles.
E) Why would we ban hand guns? You ask questions without making an argument? Weird. Well, if you aren't arguing anything, no need to respond.








. All it says in the bottom is Crime Statistics are more reliable then Victim ones, but you know what?