By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Jaywood2010 on 06 February 2013
Edit Thread
bananaking21 said:
riderz13371 said:
Jereel Hunter said:
riderz13371 said:

http://www.metacritic.com/company/microsoft-game-studios

74 - Lowest rated = 28

http://www.metacritic.com/company/scea

73 - Lowest rated = 36

@bold - Now unless you consider a 1 point difference to be the deciding factor, your statement right there is wrong. Not to mention Sony has 152 more games than Microsoft but still only has received 11 negative reviews whereas Microsoft has received a total of 15. 

You know what that means right? if microsoft has more low scores(i.e. kinect shovelware) while publishing notably less titles, it means their mid tier and AAA games score quite a bit higher than Sony's, on average, to counteract it.

Based on what you just said, Microsoft has a large number of terrible titles bringing down their averages, whereas Sony publishes loads of games with a higher floor and lower ceiling. Do you consider this a good thing?  I suppose if you have time to pay 50 games a year, you want masses of decent games, but seeing as how these stats suggest that MS non shovelware games must score multiple points higher, on average, than sony's, indicates that a selective player has a better upper tier selection to choose from.

He said Microsoft publishes better games than Sony, I showed him otherwise.


dude just dont bother with this nonesense 

 

Edit : its exactly what jaywood, yes JAYWOOD wants!! he wants everybody to fight and argue so that he can get 2 POINTS with every POST!!! he is an evil genius !!

Shhhh! Don't let them know mr banana :P

It's ok guys, carry on with your alls arguments.  I need to go count.....I mean I'll talk to you all later XD