gigantor21 said:
A company's first console is the only case where I would make cross-company comparisons. I put it like that mainly because people keep saying the Wii U doesn't count as next-gen for some reason. And even then, I would put release date up as the main metric--I'd put stuff like the Steam Box and Ouya in the same generation as the Wii U/PS4/720 for that reason, even though the latter may well end up being even weaker than current gen stuff. I just see a lot of these debates as an excuse for people to look down on other consoles they don't like, more than anything else. It's so petty. |
But thats a really arbitary rule saying that the rules change if it's the first console. And if it's to do with release date then why is the PS3 super slim not 8th gen as that came out a few months before Wii U?
As stated in the first post, this is merely a metric and nothing to do with the quality of a console. If you think it is petty then please look at point 5 - would you then say that we don't need the gen label at all?







