bananaking21 said:
Mazty said:
That question is in the realms of logic, as in adhere to a hypothesis being logically criticised.
Scientific logic isn't altered by probability.
If you ignore hardware, then how can you even determine a successor? How is the 360 elite not the successor of the 360?
|
the next generation xbox containing 1khzcpu and 1kb ram is no where in the realms of logic. its not a probablity.
and because the 360 elite contains the same parts to run the same games on the original 360. the run the same games and have the same specs. no increase in ram, no increase in cpu, or a better gpu.
|
I'm talking about actual logic:
log·ic
/ˈläjik/
|
Noun
- Reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity: "experience is a better guide to this than deductive logic".
- A particular system or codification of the principles of proof and inference: "Aristotelian logic".
|
|
To classify the elite as the same as the 360, you are looking at hardware. You can't say that next-gen is not determined by hardware and then rule out consoles from that gen by looking at hardware.
curl-6 said:
Mazty said:
So then a successor is determined just by the name? If you ignore the hardware then how are you determining what is a successor? How is the 360 elite not the 360's successor if you are ignoring hardware?
|
Because the 360 Elite is still, by brand, an Xbox 360.
|
Wii -> Wii U ?
If you ignore hardware, then how can you determine the difference or similarities in consoles?
