bananaking21 said:
thats in your OP, atleast ask reasonable questions within the realms of logic. your question isnt. i dont want to be rude but there are more than one user asking the same question in a way. |
That question is in the realms of logic, as in adhere to a hypothesis being logically criticised.
Scientific logic isn't altered by probability.
If you ignore hardware, then how can you even determine a successor? How is the 360 elite not the successor of the 360?
| IIIIITHE1IIIII said: You don't have to be stronger, smarter or superior over your forefathers in any conceivable way to be part of the newer generations.
|
Firstly biology should work in the manner that you are the improvement of your parents on a genetic level due to how it works.
Secondly care to explain why you don't have to be an improvement?
Thridly as I stated in the OP, this thread has been mod approved, so please quit the "lock thread" talk. Its obvious that the Wii U has highlighted a discrepancy in what people believe defines what makes something next-gen, hence the reason it'd be good to talk about.







