ninjablade on 05 February 2013
| Wyrdness said: How can they tell the power when the GPU is a ground up component not based on any GPU by what Morrison is saying, they don't know the tech but some how can determine full performance? Sounds like you're very gullible. |
mabye you try reading from page 173 to 179 or here is a quote from the mod Shifty Geezer they based the gpu numers of these facts and they were pretty sure and correct, of course i'm gonna trust these guys.
On a par. Any performance advantages Wii U may have are offset by limitations (being small and low power draw), such that any increase in overall performance (nigh impossible to measure) above current gen will be fractional rather than a multiple.
Informed speculation based on a number of data as Function has outlined (including dev comments). It is nigh impossible for Nintendo to have produced a smaller, lower-power draw device that improves (at all, let alone significantly) on overall performance, especially when we know the memory is so damned slow. Only if they have secretly used a much smaller node is that possible.
I don't see how anyone can question the evidence. That's illogical
I don't see how anyone can question the evidence. That's illogical
Originally Posted by function 
Die sizes, CPU process node, main memory type and quantity and bus size, clocks, power consumption, and the DF analyses are not pure speculation.
We easily know enough to say that the Wii U is in the PS360 ballpark
We easily know enough to say that the Wii U is in the PS360 ballpark
__________________
