| happydolphin said: Okay, my objective is not to talk on opinion but on something tangible. If I have nothing then I have nothing. It was my understanding that a game like NSMB did not have a level of depth that warranted its price, but by God if you think it is then who am I to judge? The fact that you don't like LoL doesn't change the fact that it is insanely popular, and has undeniable replayability, even if you don't like it. I'm not sure the same can be said objectively about NSMB given its price. My prediction is that over time people in general will notice this discrepancy and will begin to lose interest in Nintendo's offerings. I'm just suggesting that, before that happens, something should be done about it before it's too late. Not sure what's so unreasonable about this. It's my analysis of the situation. In my opinion NSMB does not have the depth required to be sold at its price when other games on the market offer more depth at a better price. It is subjective, but it's also a sensible point to make I don't see how unreasonable a point this is. Again, the problem with your SFIV argument is that the cheaper alternatives are certainly not better than it since SFIV is of the utmost quality in the fighter genre, I can't say the same about NSMB. And you may think that's subjective, but it doesn't take a rocket-scientist to realize that NSMB is a cash-in for the company and lacks the depth other platformers have in general. It isn't crafted imho. SFIV most certainly is. |
Get off your high horse as you've contradicted yourself and proved my point, firstly the point with SFIV is that the same argument you're applying now can essentially be applied to it and the fact that you're defending SFIV means that I've got my point through to you with that example, I play many fighters and some of the free ones are brilliant, I know people who see the alternatives as better then SFIV like what you're trying here but I bet you won't see it the same with a game like SFIV. The games you listed are good for what they are but for most part aren't considered in the same league as the first party offering by many.
No NSMB is not a cash in I see that poor argument from the usual critics who just don't like the game, the series is a modern take of the classic 2d series in NSMBU for starters you can really see the design concepts behind each level and such again this is just you throwing your opinion in there. Predict all you want but frankly I don't care, Mario has been around since 83 when he debuted as Jumpman and is still going the's a fair chance the platform genre would be either dead or in life support if it weren't for his games both the 2d and 3d incarnations of the genre which has seen many come and gone I won't bet against the franchise especially when it's doing numbers now that only COD can touch.
Many people also play games on Facebook and Angry Birds so what's your point on people playing LOL, the game is not even a 2d platformer so the comparison for most part is broken.
