Jay520 on 05 February 2013
@RCT
Well obviously if tie your definition of morality to God's character, then of course there can't be morality without him. Basically you're saying "humans lack the ability to be "God" which is quite obvious.
If your definition of morality isn't what's best for the most people possible, then morality is pretty useless. If morality isn't what's best for most people, then why should people be "moral"? We shouldn't. We should do what's best for the most people possible, and if that's not moral by your definition, then humanity shouldn't be "moral". Either way, doing what's best for the most people possible would have the same end result as acting morally.
