RCTjunkie said:
Only 2/3rds of the babies shared their toys and showed a concept of fairness, and amongst those there were babies that only offered their least favorite toy. That's not a universal, absolute sense of morality. It just shows that morality is varied amongst others as they choose and also to what degree. Even if there is a correlation, having such doesn't give enough justification to dub those that act on them any morally superior than those who don't from an evolutionary standpoint, specifically in cases where going against established morality would benefit yourself greatly.
|
Well nobody's going to have an absolut sense of morality inherently, certainly, but neither does it need to be supernaturally explained. What the study shows is that the babies have a rudimentary sense of justice, something that, with our rational minds, we can sort out into something more comprehensive and absolute, but that this germ of goodness comes from us (which again, may indirectly be of divine origin) and doesn't need to be transmitted through any sort of scripture, prophet, or messiah.

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.







