One year after, FFXIII-2 is one of the lowest-rated game on GamrReview. Is that normal?

[golfgt170]

ryuzaki57 said:

A203D said:

3. Ultimately, yes review scores are important. But looking at the sales, FF13-2 has sold about half the copies of FF13. That means a lot of players just wern't interested in the sequel after playing the first one. That does not bode well for FF13-3. While personally at this point in time I have no intention of buying, despite being a long time fan of the series.

I must disagree : people not buying doesn't mean the game is bad, it just means they're not interested. If Ni no Kuni sells less than FFXIII, FFXIII-2 or Lightning Returns, can we consider it a bad game because people were less interested than in bad games like FFXIII-2? Is Resident Evil Revelations bad because everyone bought RE6 instead? Seriously the amount of sales is not relevant in this debate.

^ this is what killed this generation: Every developer wanted their game to sell like CoD = more casual /westernized games from all companies. 

Then comes ni no kuni and reviewers are raging about its high difficulty. But i say this to all: JRPGS are all about farming XP before moving to next area! thats how it works. so GTFO with casual gaming!