the2real4mafol said:
thranx said:
the2real4mafol said:
SxyxS said:
kain_kusanagi said:
When did the media start referring to emissions as "climate pollution"? |
Since climategate they were forced to change names and strategies to keep the lie alive
Former "global warming" is now called "climate change".As the word climate change does not have the strong manipulative impact as "global warming" they need to add some new words-just like"climate pollution".
wanna know more about climate lie?
Donna Lafromboise book"the delinquent teenager..."
|
The climate does change (for hotter or colder) every other thousand years, whether we humans contribute to this change or not is another matter. Maybe some parts of the media blow it out of proportion. But we must change our livestyles in case the worst happens or we will the face ultimate consequence, extinction. Recycling and increasingly relying on renewable and effiecient energy is apart of our future, whether you like it or not. Coal, oil and gas are running out anyway, so we might as well start the change.
The change in climate in the last 1000 years is known, it's fact from the accounts of people who lived back then. It's certainly not a lie that climate changes, although co2 being a factor for this change, probably is a lie.
|
We are n ot running out of any of those. it wont happen anytime soon or in the foreseeable future. every year more sources are found, and more ways are found to extract it. Nor is there any danger of going extinct due to pollution. if pollution reached that levels, as people died of there would be less pollution made until there was a balance again.
|
Oil at least will run out sooner rather than later, why else are we seeing wars over it?
|
Well for one... we aren't seeing wars over oil.
At least not since the FIRST Iraq war when Iraq attacked Kuwait... which was also debt focused.
