JayWood2010 said:
DigitalDevilSummoner said:
JayWood2010 said:
DigitalDevilSummoner said:
here's a problem, Alan Wake for example was ported on the PC (which sold pretty well) since the sales on the xbox were on the low end. sony and nintendo titles sell well
here's another, MS has proven this gen that it does not give a flying cr@p about studios that don't make mega hits (for example japanese rpg devs, remedy)
here's a third, porting such games would take a lot of money itself and usually the results are pretty bad since we are talking about completely different architectures (unlike the 360 and the PC which are pretty similar) example; the crappy port of Dark Souls |
horrible comment. Halo, Halo 2, Fable , Fable III, and now possibly Halo 3. also sell badly? Nooope. That's what i thought.
|
halo, halo 2 and fable were first xbox games. when we see Gears 3 and Halo 4 on the PC THEN we will talk.
|
Oh yes just ignore every other game i said. Every one of those games are games that sell insaley well including Halo 3 which has sold 11 million. What PS3 game has sold 11m? Oh that is right......Im fine with you disagreeing but dont act like that. And MSFT published gears 1 on PC as well. I see absolutely no reason that you gave on why this is a bad idea. It is a simple way to mazximize profts but you bring up something that makes you yourself look bad by saying things that are completely false.
And notice i said years later. for example port them whene ps4 comes out.
|
Every other game ? Halo 3 is not on the PC. All three of my points stand.
