| RCTjunkie said: 1. But it all ties together in the sense that if a majority society believes something like human sacrifice is moral and doesn't frown upon it, then what would be the reason for not doing such things without a morality to stop you? 2. Responding to the answer, it would still be immoral for such a society to do immoral things even if it only lasted a short time. Why did Hitler's short reign matter? Does morality play into that? |
1. If the majority of society believes human sacrifice is moral, then there would no "reason" to not do those things. I think you give to much credit to humans. Without laws & practical consequences, you would see how terrible human morality really is. Without laws & consequences, people would for the most part do what they want regardless of morality.
That's not the point I was making. My point was if a society practices "immoral" acts such as murder & rape, then eventually it would fix itself since those actions are bad for society. Either the society would die or it would change.







