By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
BlueFalcon said:
ethomaz said:
The name is under NDA... nobody knows yet... 780? 790? 695?

Here the link: http://www.techpowerup.com/179605/First-NVIDIA-GeForce-Titan-780-Performance-Numbers-Revealed.html

Edit - And SLI GTX 680 can't reach X7000 in 3DMark.


Let's think for a second. An 1137mhz on the core with additional GPU boost GTX680 gets 3,722 points. http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/graphics/display/gigabyte-geforce-gtx-680-super-overclock-windforce-5x_6.html#sect1

7107 points means 91% faster than an 1137mhz GTX680, which means  you'd need 91% more resources than a GTX680 on 1 chip unless the 3DMark11's scores are all whacked. GTX680 at 1137mhz uses 190W of power. Let me know how you can add 91% more CUDA cores, TMUs, ROPs, and memory bandwidth on the same 28nm node.

Looks too good to be true.

Hummmm...

The Geforce Titan have 2880 shaders processors instead the 1536 found in the GTX 680... that's near 90% more CUDA cores.