BlueFalcon on 31 January 2013
| ethomaz said: The name is under NDA... nobody knows yet... 780? 790? 695? Here the link: http://www.techpowerup.com/179605/First-NVIDIA-GeForce-Titan-780-Performance-Numbers-Revealed.html Edit - And SLI GTX 680 can't reach X7000 in 3DMark. |
Let's think for a second. An 1137mhz on the core with additional GPU boost GTX680 gets 3,722 points. http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/graphics/display/gigabyte-geforce-gtx-680-super-overclock-windforce-5x_6.html#sect1
7107 points means 91% faster than an 1137mhz GTX680, which means you'd need 91% more resources than a GTX680 on 1 chip unless the 3DMark11's scores are all whacked. GTX680 at 1137mhz uses 190W of power. Let me know how you can add 91% more CUDA cores, TMUs, ROPs, and memory bandwidth on the same 28nm node.
Looks too good to be true.
