bananaking21 said:
i did not once say that. i gave an example saying that if two people were up for a scholorship, one was poor the other was rich, give the scholorship to the poor guy instead of the rich one, that way you have two people recieving education instead of one because the rich kid can afford to pay |
That's exactly what you said:
| bananaking21 said: now your discriminating against the poor because they dont have the same means of edjucation to recieve high grades. even if lets say that that a poor kid and rich kid are going to the same school, the rich kid is getting higher grades. who should recieve the scholorship? definatly the poor kid. the rich kid has the money to recieve an edjucation, the poor kid doesnt. this way you have two people getting edjucated instead of one |
You made it about means rather that merit. And that is with what I fundamentally disagree.







