The diminished sexual feeling thing is of course bull, since no one can be both circumcised and uncircumcised in their infancy to test the difference.
Saying I shouldn't have children is silly and way over the top. It also ignores the fact that in North America circumcision had been commonplace and most are perfectly fine parents.
Everyone against it has completely ignored the fact that their are dramatic and proven health benifits. I'm sure they are fine with vaccinating girls for HPV, but having the boys circumcised is a better way to prevent the spread of the disease, with less risk of side effects.
Comparing circumcision to rape is disgusting.
I normally don't get involved in these off topic conversations, but this one annoys me. Primarily because of the complete ignorance in its discussion. My big questions is, among those who are so adamantly against infant circumcision, among those of you who are saying it damages sexual feeling, that it's mutalation, that it's all of these horrible things, who among you is actually a male who was circumcised in their infancy? Anyone? Hello? Cricket...cricket...
