Veknoid_Outcast said:
That's...actually not a bad idea. A Zelda trilogy, if handled correctly, could be really good. Maybe each game could focus on a single piece of the Triforce? |
S.Peelman said: (wish you could multiquote, DanneSandin should also get the blue notifier here...) It would be awesome if they'd tried that again. A little anecdote: [Long and interesting anecdote]Nowadays, they probably should be able to do this on the WiiU as everything could be done through the savegames on the system memory. Of course, they could also just do a traditional trilogy where the games all stand-alone and follow each other linearly. I think it would be a cool idea, if they find a way to not make it repetitive and have each game have some kind of unique feature, or something . |
Did both of you get a blue notifier?!
Interesting anecdote! Although, I already knew it was planned as a trilogy, it was interesting nonetheless!
But yeah, I think I and Veknoid is thinking in the same line of thinking here! A trilogy about each Triforce, and a story stretching over all the games, ties together, but still playable by themselves. If done right it would be a great experience! And to be honest, I'm not sure Nintendo can do this right, so it would be better off with Retro imo - or maybe Monolith? I think they've proven themselves that they can make one hell of a story with Xenoblade...
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.