| riderz13371 said: HAH! You gave me quite a laugh to be honest. The reason there is a clear difference between Call of Duty on Xbox and PS3 is because Activision is clearly more heavily focused on the 360 version of the game. This has nothing to do with Sony or the PS3, it is Activision's fault as well as the developer. Also in regards to your Battlefield comment, Battlefield games have had dedicated servers for a while now and therefore there is rarely any lag and there is absolutely no difference between Battlefield games on the 360 or PS3 other than the fact the PS3 users get the DLC early. I've played Bad Company 2 for over 50 hours and I have NEVER been dropped out of a game or even experienced any lag whatsoever. This is all thanks to dedicated servers. Boy do I love dedi servers. |
No offense but what a load of crap. Bad Company 2 servers on PS3 (and 360, and PC) had tons of issues. And this is coming from someone who played the heck out of the game on PS3. EA is known for having terrible servers. But at least on BC2 they didn't rent them out to people, destroying the game like they did for BF3.
And you're right about one thing at least, the latency was no better or worse across the two consoles, because EA services suck consistently. The suckness does not favor one console over the other, it sucks on both equally.
