JayWood2010 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
JayWood2010 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
wfz said:
Anyone want to sum this up in a few sentences? |
PS3's single player quality, is equal to MS multiplayer quality, and PS3 is overall the better product, and these guys spent the whole time contradicting them selves.
|
From the way i heard it it was obvious in what they were trying to say. PS3 has more exclusives but they dont put much time into them because they are singleplayer games, wheras games like halo and gears are more focused on multiplayer so they put a lot more time into them. However they would prefer if everything was just on 1 console instead of spending an extra 3-400 dollars to play 1 game on another console. I dont really think they contradicted themselves at all.
EDIT: NOT saying I agree with them because i dont but I understood what they were saying.
|
these guys couldn't make up their minds if they wanted the flu, or a fever.
Playstation has the better exclusives, 360 has the better mutiplayer games, PS3 has more, 360 has quality, ect. i couldn't stand listening to the whole thing, as it was so inconsistent.
wouldn't better equal quality whether it' single or multiplayer. KZ over Halo multiplayer but that's just me.
these guys may want to start using TelePrompTers, or find better day jobs. Morgan Web would have done a better job whether being inconsistent, or consistent.
@riderz13371 i know right! these guys are in serious need of common sense, as they make no sense.
|
They are saying they invest more time in games like Halo and Gears than what they do on any PS3 game because replayability. You are in a very lonely opinion about KZ over halo so dont act likey yours is the only opinion.
Smosh is the most subscribed channel on youtube, so of course SmoshGames will be popular and probably makes them a lot of money. i'd prefer to take peoples opinions that is not biased central like we see on gaming forums. Am I saying I agree about I want exclusives on one console? No. Would that be great? Yeah, but I didnt really hear them say anything that you said that was false.
|
well i don't agree that a multiplayer component makes a game more valuable, or in being so makes its quality rise above that of sigle player games.
when they talk about Sony having better exclusives but 360 has better quality. that to me makes no sense.
one things true, people do seemingly play multiplayer games on 360 which is based on need from what i can tell. friends, and service being those reasons, but i play both with blinders on so i don't see the difference.
if i bundle my top 5 online multiplayer games they would go as follows:
1. KZ
2. GEARS
3. LBP
4. Starhawk
5. UC
you do know i hate COD and battle field right, and don't get me started on Halo.
