riderz13371 said:
JayWood2010 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
wfz said:
Anyone want to sum this up in a few sentences? |
PS3's single player quality, is equal to MS multiplayer quality, and PS3 is overall the better product, and these guys spent the whole time contradicting them selves.
|
From the way i heard it it was obvious in what they were trying to say. PS3 has more exclusives but they dont put much time into them because they are singleplayer games, wheras games like halo and gears are more focused on multiplayer so they put a lot more time into them. However they would prefer if everything was just on 1 console instead of spending an extra 3-400 dollars to play 1 game on another console. I dont really think they contradicted themselves at all.
EDIT: NOT saying I agree with them because i dont but I understood what they were saying.
|
That has got to be the most idiotic thing I have ever heard/read in my life. Really who the hell are these guys lol? Seems as if they are popular but I've never heard of them ebfore.
|
No it makes perfect sense and even in my case it is like this. I have put more hours into Gears of War than what I have with all 25 games i own on PS3. Same goes with Halo. They are simply saying that MSFT exclusives tend to have better multiplayer games where Sony tends to have better single player games like Uncharted and God of War.
