Console Exclusive Games are killing us

[KHlover]

riderz13371 said:

KHlover said:

riderz13371 said:

JayWood2010 said:

MARCUSDJACKSON said:

wfz said:
Anyone want to sum this up in a few sentences?

PS3's single player quality, is equal to MS multiplayer quality, and PS3 is overall the better product, and these guys spent the whole time contradicting them selves.

From the way i heard it it was obvious in what they were trying to say.  PS3 has more exclusives but they dont put much time into them because they are singleplayer games, wheras games like halo and gears are more focused on multiplayer so they put a lot more time into them.  However they would prefer if everything was just on 1 console instead of spending an extra 3-400 dollars to play 1 game on another console.  I dont really think they contradicted themselves at all.

EDIT:  NOT saying I agree with them because i dont but I understood what they were saying.

That has got to be the most idiotic thing I have ever heard/read in my life. Really who the hell are these guys lol? Seems as if they are popular but I've never heard of them ebfore.

Well, they DO have a point there. If a game has a good multiplayer it probably has a better replay value (depending on the genre and quality of the SP of course) -> I'll put more time into the game. I don't get though why more exclusives should be a bad thing? 

I thought what they ment by that is that developers don't put enough time into their games if they don't include multiplayer. Meaning if your game has multiplayer and single player you have put more development time into the game than someone who has only created a single player game.

Just...wow. Most ridiculous thing I read on the internet today.