JayWood2010 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
wfz said:
Anyone want to sum this up in a few sentences? |
PS3's single player quality, is equal to MS multiplayer quality, and PS3 is overall the better product, and these guys spent the whole time contradicting them selves.
|
From the way i heard it it was obvious in what they were trying to say. PS3 has more exclusives but they dont put much time into them because they are singleplayer games, wheras games like halo and gears are more focused on multiplayer so they put a lot more time into them. However they would prefer if everything was just on 1 console instead of spending an extra 3-400 dollars to play 1 game on another console. I dont really think they contradicted themselves at all.
EDIT: NOT saying I agree with them because i dont but I understood what they were saying.
|
these guys couldn't make up their minds if they wanted the flu, or a fever.
Playstation has the better exclusives, 360 has the better mutiplayer games, PS3 has more, 360 has quality, ect. i couldn't stand listening to the whole thing, as it was so inconsistent.
wouldn't better equal quality whether it' single or multiplayer. KZ over Halo multiplayer but that's just me.
these guys may want to start using TelePrompTers, or find better day jobs. Morgan Web would have done a better job whether being inconsistent, or consistent.
@riderz13371 i know right! these guys are in serious need of common sense, as they make no sense.
