| Dno said: i read it and got the point and whatever people are agreeing with does not mean its true. You are comparing ps1, and ps2 (with over 1 THOUSAND GAMES EACH!!!) that have been out for 7 seven years PLUS to a new sysytem thats only been out for a year in ony TWO regions and half a year in the other...... thats kinda stupid... |
I understand that the ps3 is still in its early stages, but there is a world of difference between the variety of games you found on the ps2 and ps3. Even after one year.
I understand why it is the way it is. Game costs are high, and developers need to market games they know will sell to people the know will buy. I'm just not pleased about it.
However, if you can list games to counter my point (taking into account you know what it means to not be a big budget, main stream focused game), please share.
