Mr Khan said:
Kasz216 said:
Mr Khan said:
Kasz216 said:
Mr Khan said:
In this case there is a fixed perspective on "better."
|
Which seems to be fixed soley around your personal opinioin.
|
Basically, yeah. Though i'm not suggesting that all government should match my opinion, but from my observations of history and modern politics, i think that i'm at least spitting in the right general direction.
|
I would argue... you aren't... instead simply splitting things in regard to personal preference... which is generally the problem. Your more or less picking which civil rights you view as valid.
Using your logic, everyone is going to have their own opinion on the validity of such things.
Simply put, you don't think Texas should cede, because you feel like they would do things you don't like. That's the bare bones truth of it.
|
The only "right" i take umbrage with are certain property rights (including guns, intellectual property, and certain issues of wealth transfer), otherwise i'm in favor of more rights, and not fewer, and feel that those secessionists would likely restrict certain lifestyle and belief rights, as state legislative evidence suggests
|
Even if that's so... that still completely proves my point.
You don't give a shit about property rights, therefore you don't consider the restriction of property rights a valid reason for leaving a country. This stance is based soley on your own hangups and opinions.
I am cuirous though what you think about the big movement to leave that you left out. Scotland leaving the UK.
