Kasz216 said:
I would argue... you aren't... instead simply splitting things in regard to personal preference... which is generally the problem. Your more or less picking which civil rights you view as valid. Using your logic, everyone is going to have their own opinion on the validity of such things. Simply put, you don't think Texas should cede, because you feel like they would do things you don't like. That's the bare bones truth of it. |
The only "right" i take umbrage with are certain property rights (including guns, intellectual property, and certain issues of wealth transfer), otherwise i'm in favor of more rights, and not fewer, and feel that those secessionists would likely restrict certain lifestyle and belief rights, as state legislative evidence suggests

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.







