M.U.G.E.N said:
riderz13371 said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
kitler53 said:
the way the story ending in infamous2 (good or bad endings) leaves little material to work with in a sequel. i hate the idea of picking up the 3rd with a forced perspective of we ended the last game evil (because i like playing as the good guy).
give me something new, they fucked up the franchise with the last installment. |
Dunno man...could be a REALLY cool game if they went off the evil ending. World would be so fucked yet so crazy at the same time. Maybe a cliche redemption story or something.
Either way Sucker Punch imho always delivers on the gameplay. Dat ice jump
|
Loved the ice jump! Also I think it would be hard for them to make a sequel to inFamous 2. In inFamous 1 the endings were very similar so it was easier to make a sequel to that, but inFamous 2 endings were vastly different. I just think it's a little too hard to make a third game.
|
nah I mean
if they go by the good ending: it would be pretty easy to do...and would be kinda boring imho
if they go by the evil ending: the world for I3 could be VERY different one that the last game. Chaotic and fun. I can think of some cool possibilities
However, as I see it, they need a new lead character. I think cole is a cool character but not suitable for this game. Fans were too whiny about them trying to change the character model really. So I wouldn't be surprised if they used the traversal mechanics in a new game with a new main character
|
What if they made you play as Kessler? So you sort of see what he did when he was running away from the beast. Since Kessler is essentially Cole, I think that would be pretty cool. Sort of like a prequel.
