| Michael-5 said: !. We both could be wrong, for now I sill side with the general concensus. The Nature vs. Nurture debate strongly favors nature, and I'll believe what the scientists believe as I think they are the most educated on the subject. |
1. You must not know what a concensus means.
2. Are you trying to assert that just because a condition is caused by environmental factors, that means somewhere in the world, that condition would not exist? What is this logic based on? You could say the same thing about any preference which is caused by environmental factors. Just because they're environmental factors doesn't mean there should be one place where that preference doesn't exist.
Let's look at this sentence you said here:
"So are you saying that there isn't enough diversity in the world for one environment to exist which doesn't have the factors which lead to homosexuality?"
There is no "one environment." That doesn't make sense. Every person in the world experiences different environment factors. There is always complex differences in how everyone experiences the world.
As for this:
"There is no 1 population (small representable group of people) in the world which isn't homosexual"
Do you have a link to back this up? Or are you just making random guesses.
3. Yes, it's a preference. That's why it's called sexual preference. Are you screwing with me or have you not heard of the term sexual preference? Gay people prefer people of their own sex. Straight people prefer people of a different sex. You seem to be implying that all preferences are conscious choices. That's simply not the case.







