I haven't read so much rubbish on here for a very long time , if you followed some of this logic it seems that Sony is simply compounding the mistake it made by entering the portable market with the psp in the first place . and that's a product that gained 30 % market share showing there was room for both parties in the portable space and both could grow , this from a machine that had a lot of the same criticism leveled at it that the Vita gets now , ironically a fair percentage of Vita doom is from people who don't own or really want one and from that stand point echo those who feel that way about the Wii U, still in the end time will decide where the Vita sits and as to profitability all we can go on is Kaz at the beginning forecasting 3 years to full profitability , that time period seemed to me to imply that the brand would have paid for itself by then rather than just each unit making money , although I also feel that time period might have lengthened if they where using their early sales estimates , then again who knows maybe they are on track simply because they haven't dropped the price and the memory card margins are high and not coming down , things have changed since the Vita was first envisioned but the Vita will ride it out changes will be made and even if it doesn't sell quite as much hardware as the psp it could possibly do better software wise especially on the digital side.
Research shows Video games help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot
