| Michael-5 said: 1. You said it's probably like 10-15% biological or something didn't you and that it's mostly psychological? You're saying it now that most homosexuals aren't homosexual for biological reasons. 2. If environment is the cause to homosexuality, how come we see relatively similar populations of homosexuals among all ethnic groups? Surely there's bound to be enough diversity and variation among peoples lifestyles in all the world for some population somewhere to be without homosexuals, but there isn't. |
1. Yeah, I said that's what I think. I don't claim to know because I don't know. Until the nature vs nurture debate ends, there's no point in claiming that anyone knows. I could be wrong.
2. I do not think I understand your question, but I'll try to answer. Environment is not just natural environment such as land, air, water, food, etc. By environment, I'm including everything other than biological factors. Basically, every factor after birth is included in environmental factors. This can include social structure, family, relationships, culture, values, etc. I should have said environmental & social factors, but I thought you knew that already. I hope that answers your question.
3. Again, I don't think I understand your question. I thought it was agreed that it was just a matter of preference. That's why it's called sexual preference. What are you asking?
