Jay520 on 18 January 2013
| timmah said: Obstaining from an activity is not the same as engaging in an activity that is counter to the natural purpose of the activity, so I wouldn't see a good argument for Monks having a disorder. I do think calling homosexuality a disorder could be an overly broad application of the term, but still there are interesting points to be made either way. |
Here is the definition of disorder you presented:
"A medical condition involving a disturbance to the usual functioning of the mind or body."
How does abstinence not satisfy this definition?
