yeah, but then play wii tennis, then put in something like mario tennis and see how it has things to unlock, depth in gameplay, etc.
I can make a game that has you doing nothing but hold up, I can make it so that the only graphics are a green backround and a black arrow on the screen, and I can make it so it has NO screen tearing, no framerate problems, no blurry textures, nothing. The logic that it has no flaws thus it should score perfectly isn't a good way to think, because it would mean that people can take a minimal approach and that's it.
Humans by nature want more rather then less, even if it means flaws come with the depth. Mario galaxy has camera issues in some spots, if you look close at the textures they can get blurry, yet people prefer this over something that is 'perfect' but tries to do very little.
People strive for perfection with depth. You can date a sheet of white paper and say, it looks perfect and does no wrong to me, or you can date a cute girl who might argue once in awhile, do you prefer the paper?
Probably.
Note: Some games in my collection are no longer owned, but have owned.
