By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
babuks on 16 January 2013
Edit Thread
disolitude said:
babuks said:
I think Google would have been better for Facebook. Surely they called for higher price but their technology is far superior than Bing. Anyhow, I don't think Facebook needs Google like search ability, so Bing is ok.


In terms of just searches I don't see any huge superiority on the Google side. Google has better integrated services like Maps, but if we're talking searches only, you're blowing things out of proportion with that statement. 

I don't think you understand what Bing will do for Facebook or what this product is. It's not a generic search box...


Not going into debate on what Bing can do on Facebook because I think Bing is fine for search in facebook as not lots to search for there comparing to Google.com.

Now, today I searched for 'Cold pressed extra virgin' on google, looking for what the benefit of this type of olive oil. The search result google showed was enough for me to gather knowledge on the subject. On the other hand, Bing showed me 'extra virgin coconut oil' on the top. I don't find Bing's image search a comfortable feature to use too. So, I guess Google is 'far superior' is not a thing I stretched out of proportion.