Fifaguy360 said:
fordy said:
I'll bring up an interesting topic on this: In computer science, there is no "true random" generation in code. It's generally pretty reliant on methods and routines to generate a random number based on the current state of the machine. This is why (in an unchanging machine), that game playback in some games can mirror the original exactly, just by recording the user input at each interrupt...
That being said, I am one for choice and coincidence, but on an atomic level, one can easily see we're slowly discovering the laws by which these universal systems enact, and if we eventually made a perfected "atomic simulator", wouldn't that then prove that we're living in a world of fate? |
We are the atomic simulator :)
Seriously though, we cannot know the future in any way. We just deal with odds/likelihood for example, the weather forecast.
|
Nono, I've had an epiphany...
We are...the universe is.....the atomic machine...one in many. We are the creation of a smaller universe, one to determine their own future by simulation.
In order to simulate an atomic machine, you require a simulator in orders of magnitudes of power above their own. We are...a lower level version simulating the atoms of a smaller universe...
