Mr Khan said:
If the prisons were non-profit, there'd be less cause for exploitation. Like the thing with the judge that you mentioned. No prison would bribe judges to make more prisoners if they weren't getting mad cash out of the deal. |
Sure they would. There would be less cause for it, but non profit CEO pay works just like for profit CEO pay. Or Oldschool CEO pay before stock options anyway.
What they get paid is based on how well the Non-profit is doing. The more profit a non-profit makes, the more they can justify being paid and the more the trustees will reward them for doing a good job.
Afterall, Nonprofit companies do make profits. It's just those profits aren't paid out to investors. Instead it stays in the company for further projects, like opening more prisons, etc.
Therefore the decision makers of a private prison project can justify being paid more if they open more non-profit prisons that they manage and increase their revenue. The bigger the nonprofit, the more the CEO gets paid...
http://www.charitynavigator.org/__asset__/studies/2012_CEO_Compensation_Study_Final.pdf
Or a government prison head, could justify being paid more when their union renegotiation comes around if they are managing more prisons/prisoners/making more profit by leasing prison workers to private companies/saving politcians from having to raise taxes by making everyones liscense plates for free.








