Ok, I've watched it all. It's better than I thought it would after first impresion. For a journalistic job it is fine. At least they've started with one substantial thing when talking about Iraq:
Funny quote (tragic voice): "Nothing... of what he claimed was true...", -- O'rly? Wasn't it obvious before? Though I could believe that Powell wasn't lying and as he claims was deceived. But I surely cannot beleive that CIA was deceived. UNSCOM's Ritter is there as well. What? Changed his opinion already? At the time he was saying quite different things.
Some BBC lady answering the question "Why the media didn't get it?": "...because lack of access...", -- what a load of bollocks and desperate attempt at covering your lying arse. Has smth changed about BBC? Well, judge for yourself... like Lybia or Syria and counting. He challenged her again with uncomfortable question on covering Palestinians point of view practically saying: "Where the f**k is your objectivity?" -- oh boy, how lame did she sound trying to asnwer it.
Hollywood did take some beating too, like it :D ...and then cry and sniffle kicks in. Some Israeli war crimes, some Assange, that's common.
//Still all of these are old news and Pulcinella's secret overall, might be interesting for those who's absolutely blind or didn't give a shit about farce happening at the time... justice, lol.
