|
the2real4mafol said: Yeah just what i don't understand, this sort of thing has nothing to do with anyone but the individual concerned. So what if they are gay, let them marry or whatever you lot think it should be called, let them adopt children. As long as they are in a happy, bonding relationship between each other and there families, there is no reason to treat them any different to a more "traditional" family. This issue is personal and yet most people feel it's neccesary to make it something that concerns them. |
Again marriage is mostly a legal term, say, to defend you proprietary interests if you get divorced or smth. Of course, there could be other definitions, including sacral, if you're religious person, but that none of a business of the rest of the society. You could easily settle those things individually by signing marital agreement. The concern of the society are kids and their well-being. Which brings a question how we should qualify homosexua families, my position is rather clear -- define them as disadvantaged families that might bring harm, unless of course if you think that parenting has no connection to child psychology and/or society is unaware of itself.
