Areym said:
Like I said, I can't come up with a valid argument against gay marriage, mainly because I support it or at the very least, I am indiferent. I should have expanded on bestiality but I got lazy and hafl-assed the post. Long story short, if a man can prove that he loves and animal and that animal loves him back equally (which I admit would be hard as fuck to do if not impossible) and he wants to ger married, can we stop him? By letting gays get married, it would be we no longer consider marriage to be between exclusively a man and woman. Now, you could deny it by saying that its interspecies love/marriage is wrong, blah blah blah. I really don't see why anybody would be butthurt about gay marriage. I mean, you're not getting married, it doesnt involve you in the least so why oppose it. At the end of the day, its religion. IT IS ALWAYS RELIGION. |
I agree. It is religion. You did raise an interesting, non-religious point though.
With this, if we managed to someday interpret animal thought and consent, I think you'd see a LOT of changes happen overnight. The world would not be the place that we see it today. Besides bestiality, I'd say a lot of people would willingly turn vegan, with a hard push for governments to ban meat consumption. Animals would suddenly get a lot more rights, too. Bestiality and marriage would be some of them.
However, it would need to be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that it's consent and not another reaction such as stress. It's a case of interpreting the mind outside of the mind, which is impossible to do. For example, how are we supposed to know that my mind interprets the colour red the exact same way as your mind? It's literally impossible to determine..







