| warlord74 said: Your analogy between race and sexual orientation is invalid. A black man can not change his mind and become white nor can a female change her mind and become male. Those are genetic traits. Sexual activity is a choice and does change among some people. Their have been no studies to show that their is a gay gene. Thus calling someone a bigot or a homophobe over their view on sexual orientation is not valid and does not address the issue at hand. Why attack some one's character why not attack there argument. Here are links of people who once engaged in homo sexual activity and have now engage in hetro sexual activity. Even the associated press agreed not to use homophobe or biggot when it comes to people who are pro marriage between a man and a woman. http://www.conservapedia.com/Ex-homosexuals http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2012/11/ap-wont-let-you-call-homophobia-homophobia/59324/ |
And here we go with the cyclic argument...
Listen, if being gay was a choice, who would choose it? It's one of the most socially rejected, culturally supressed groups in history. So tell me, WHY would people CHOOSE to be part of such a group if they had the choice? Are you implying that they're self-masochists or something? No, I don't think you're using quite a logical path of reasoning here..
Woooow, you have a list, of people who have changed their minds. Does that mean that their mindset has changed? Of course not. For all you know, these people were a shade of bisexual (which ALL of us are) and decided to move from one aspect to another. You'll probably find that there's also a list of ex-heterosexuals, too if you look hard enough. Problem is, that wouldn't help your argument now, would it?
Your press does a lot of things to appease the whingy right-wing. Calling them out on their bullshit is now apparently bias. The result? Rampant right-wing bullshit smeared everywhere.
